On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
If it seems I'm picking nits then just ignore me. (-: But I've
been following this and trying to understand it and to be honest it
doesn't always make sense.
May I ask, do you mean that IBM is being a jerk about FLEX because
of the FSI situation?
In other words, is this true: IBM had a problem with FSI, and
because of this the FLEX AD/CD situation suffered as collateral
damage.
?
Lindy
Read the article (its usually not online for a few weeks) and make up
your own mind. But to give you a flavor:
"It seems that users wanting to upgrade with new more powerful FLEX-
capable hardware are being denied."
And it goes on but the the first sentence (actually second) After
more than six months, FSI and IBM are having great difficulty
resolving the contract issues concerning S/390.
Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
