On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:27:15 -0400, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, I'll bite. Why do you "need to determine"? > >If you have any reason to think that the page is protected (presumably >because you did it or might have done it), then you can just unprotect it. >A page does not need to be protected in order to successfully unprotect. >Note that protection is not a "count" it is a "toggle". Two protects >followed by one unprotect leaves the page not protected.. > >Peter Relson >z/OS Core Technology Design > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html The need is based on stuff that can be put into key-0 CSA -or- into dynamic LPA during install time, and is briefly updated after it has been put into CSA or dynamic LPA. Since the dynamic LPA is protected, it needs to be unprotected and then reprotected, but the CSA needs neither. Hence the 'need to determine'. Thank you. Paul Schuster ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
