On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:55:32 -0500, Ed Gould wrote: > >Sigh... This was BEFORE that option was available. Please just >remember it JUST WASN"T ICKDSF it was a host of other "no-no" >programs that were in sys1.linklib. It was amaspzap and others. > This has been discussed many times on this list. There's nothing "no-no" about AMASPZAP. What's necessary is to protect the resources it might modify, not restrict access to the program. Otherwise an intruder can use a handcrafted program to do whatever harm he might to with AMASPZAP.
Is ICKDSF any different? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
