On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:33:48 +0200 "Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>>Much of this thread is, as usual, uninformed and even radically :>ignorant. :>>Those who find the syntax of COND= uncongenial are---and have for many :>years :>>now been---free to use that of IF-THEN-ELSE instead. (Since it inverts :>the :>>conventions of COND=, one or the other will presumably please :>everyone.) :>Since the OP wanted to skip a *single* step within a procedure, can you :>please :>show me how you want to achive this using IF-THEN-ELSE? My question as well. Perhaps the "uninformed and even radically ignorant" Mr. Gilmore did not bother reading the requirement. -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
