In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/08/2007
at 02:11 PM, Lionel B Dyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Come on folks - CA like any company has an obligation to protect its
>assets.
Assuming that those are it's assets. If RS actually stole the source
code[1] then the suit is amply justified. If, however, RS developed
its own code and CA is using a bogus claim to knock them down, then
it's unethical.
[1] Past behavior leaves me sceptical.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
