That's where I first heard of it as well. (Computerworld)
I too checked Google and, in the articles I read, the only thing that was
really mentioned was the "restore from backup", as you noted, and their
"Hitachi xxx 400" mainframe being the root cause (my words).
Oh, and the fact that the Phishing sites were all in overdrive how best to take
advantage of this situation.
Guess we'll hear the real story sometime down the road.
On Wed Aug 22 14:48 , Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
>In a message dated 8/22/2007 1:03:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>Anyone know what really happened?
>
>
>
>
>>>
>Haven't heard. May take a while to sort it all out. Google news{Wells Fargo
>crash} has several hits. The Computerworld article only mentions 'restore
>from backup' and tight lipped. So they got visited by Murphy and discovered
>their single point of failure for them.
>
>_http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do\?command=viewArticleBasic&taxon
>omyId=16&articleId=9031882&intsrc=hm_topic_
>(http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do\?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyId=16&articleId=9031882&intsrc=
>hm_topic)
>
>
>
>http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
