A couple of days ago...? Boy, I am falling down on the job. :( Yeah, the lawyers will win in the end, they almost always seem to. It really is sad that it came to this.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 7:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Another take on IBM vs. PSI On Aug 28, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Gary Green wrote: > http://virtualization.sys-con.com/read/421070.htm > > > > <http://e-mail-servers.com/ > c57befbfb4a31cfb9c491d89e236903dworker.jpg> > Gary, I posted a similar item a few days ago I did not comment on it as I thought the reader was up to making his/her own mind. Having said that probably the only comment that can be made is that lawyers will end up winning and the everybody else will be the losers. I certainly would not like to be judge, jury or connected with the case as it seems that there are reasonable arguments on both side of the issue. I would like to see PSI win though. Since the DOJ is blinded by $$ it cannot be considered "independent" it might be more fair (IMO) to say that the DOJ is in the hip pocket of IBM. Let the war begin. Ed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.10/976 - Release Date: 8/27/2007 6:20 PM <http://e-mail-servers.com/64eda74db708e41c2369cdf36f5398bbworker.jpg> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
