On Aug 29, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Hardee, Charles H wrote:
If it was M$, they would have been told to put the server back on the
truck and try to take it off again and then see if t works :)
I don't think so. It would probably ell them to order 100 more .
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 6:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IBM Blamed for Server packaging issue
On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
------------------------------<unsnip>---------------------------
Seems to me that the carrier would be responsible for the damages.
That's why carriers buy insurance! But then again, who supplied the
fork lift and operator?
Microsoft?:)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
