On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:39:12 -0500, Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:04:56 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: > >>We have a mixture of both. I sort of follow the same rules as with other >>data sets. System HFS files (extension of the sysres) are in the master >>catalog and have an HLQ of SYS1.OMVS. They used to be indirectly >>cataloged, but since shared file system we have had the sysres as >>part of the name and they are just cataloged to the sysres volume they >>reside on (search the archives of past posts about this). A symbolic >>is used in BPXPRMxx to mount them. > >And, of course, you could catalog your SYS1.OMVS data sets in a user catalog >if you wanted to, by creating a two level alias. > Yes. But in that case I would just use a different HLQ. The point of using SYS1 and being in the master catalog is that a "system" HFS (or zFS) is really no different than any other SMP/E target SYS1 data set on the sysres (or sysres set). Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
