On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 08:42 +0200, Barbara Nitz wrote: > And we installed the downloadable version before we migrated to 1.6, > so we've been putting up with HC for a long time.
This may have been my mistake as well. Left a very bitter taste. The shipped product is significantly better, but still has warts. I had a look at a "default" 1.7 install after my prior post. Still complains about the system console having; - routcde 11 - not enough routcde's (it's defined as routcde=ALL; customers choice) Various XCF complaints - in this case a base sysplex. Personally I don't think I should have to go in and tell component(s) this is *not* a parallel sysplex. It (H/C) should check the running system, not rely on a pile of parms to the checker itself. IMHO the over-rides should be for handling anomalies, not to (re-)define the system. For example GRS ought to be able to figure it out for itself that STAR really *isn't* the best option in a non-parallel sysplex. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
