On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:09:13 +0200, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark, > >>Some of the "stupid" checks that Barbara mentions, I've just deleted >>or updated rather than complain. I agree that the checks could be >>smarter. > >Well, I only mentioned them again because I *should* not have to delete them. I agree. I was pointing out the fact that I was taking the lazy approach instead of doing something about. I thank you again for taking the time to document your issues on IBM-MAIN. > >Also, you may want to recheck the CHECK(IBMUSS,USS_AUTOMOUNT_DELAY) thing. On my system it has disabled itself: > >BPXH029I In BPXPRMxx, SYSPLEX(NO) is being used. USS_AUTOMOUNT_DELAY >cannot run in the current environment. >HZS1003E CHECK(IBMUSS,USS_AUTOMOUNT_DELAY): >THE CHECK IS NOT APPLICABLE IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT. > >And no, there is no "sysplex" statement anywhere in the bpxprm, despite what HC says. > "SYSPLEX(NO) is there by virtue of default. Yes, that check is disabled on monoplex systems and deleted (by HC) on sysplex systems without file sharing enabled. The recommendation of 10 is only applicable to sysplex sharing, so it is appropriate for the check to be disabled or deleted in non-sharing environments. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
