On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:20:27 -0400 Bill Hecox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>I was looking at dump recently and discovered the CPU was disabled following a :>SETLOCK OBTAIN,TYPE=IOSUCB :>SETLOCK RELEASE,TYPE=IOSUCB :>I would have thought the SETLOCK RELEASE would have put the CPU back :>in the interrupts enabled state. :>Does anyone have any additional information on this? IOSUCB seems to be sekrit. Perhaps it implies getting a CPU lock (or it expects the CPU lock at entry)? Are there any locks still held upon return from the IOSUCB release? -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
