David Cole wrote on 12/31/2006 5:57 AM:
It [z/XDC] probably is a quite adequate tool for other environments
when the application code does not have ESTAE's that sometimes retry).
Yes, z/XDC is at least that.
But for myself and my customers (a fairly large number these days),
the presence of ESTAEs and their recovery routine is in no way a
hindrance to z/XDC's use. In fact, z/XDC is a great tool for
debugging, not just a program's main code, but also its ESTAEs, its
ESTAEXs, its ARRs, its FRRs *and* their recovery routines.
Does this mean that you use z/XDC to debug z/XDC? That must be fun.
/Leonard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
