Dave Thorn wrote:
If an LPAR (in a "down" state) were set to a very low weight (1, for
instance) and then IPLed, would there be problems?
This assumes that the other LPARs are not at high utilizations and using
all the CPU cycles themselves.
Has anyone done this? Have problems occurred?
I've been doing this many times. A lot of times. It was always separate
system (no GRS complex, no MIM, no shared datasets, almost no shared
volumes).
I have *never* had any problem with that. In my case 1 means 1%, I tried
even less. With or without capping. On litghtly or heavily loaded CPC.
on small and big machines (100-1700 MIPS).
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego,
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2007 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci
opacony) wynosi 118.064.140 z. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego
podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchwa XVI WZ z dnia 21.05.2003
r., kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA moe ulec podwyszeniu do kwoty 118.760.528
z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym bd w caoci opacone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
