On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 11:20:36 -0500, Scott Fagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... >Ok, let's not let the train go too far off the tracks. This thread diverged >on the discussion of PL/(S, AS, X) vs. Metal C. >... >Then, what good is PL/...? System level programming, ... >... This is role that Metal C chooses to play for us unwashed >masses. ... "... us ..."??? As in _you_? If IBM started using Metal C then the arguments against making PL/x available would apply to METAL C, too. Are you (plural) going have to switch to some super Metal C, or am I reading too much into one little word? Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
