Tom Russell wrote:
I have heard several comments from programmers that PL/X is showing its age
and doesn't generate very efficient code, especially for AMODE 64.  The IBM
C compiler has, for many years, had an offering called "System Programmer
C", which let you compile things like SMF exits in C.  It was packaged as a
separate link edit time SYSLIB that would resolve a limited set of C
external references, and create a stand-alone load module that had no
run-time library requirements.  This Metal C sounds like a logical
follow-on to SPL C, with more facilities and much better support.  With the
right optimization options specified, C can generate very efficient code as
well, much better than PL/S code.

PL/X compiler development has been moved to the compiler development group based in Toronto.

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to