> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: OPTABLE option of Disassembler > > > David Cole wrote: > > Because sometimes opcodes change meanings? Correct me if I'm wrong, > > but it seems to me that some of the new opcodes that came > out in the > > late 90s were the same as some of the old vector processor > opcodes. ... > > I never knew that! I always assumed all new opcodes were completely > unique. (Perhaps that's because I never worked with the > vector facility.) > > Any idea which opcodes are duplicates? Where are the vector facility > opcodes documented? > > -- > Edward E Jaffe
Hum, I wonder if IBM will ever "recycle" the opcodes for the old I/O instructions? (SIO, SIOF, TIO, etc...) -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
