-------MAJOR SNIPPAGE-----------


A few years ago BASE24 became available for z/OS, so you can guess the
trend. (That and, I assume, the fact virtually all Western banks now keep z/OS and core transaction systems running 24x365. Tandem's raison d'¾tre,
to keep the ATMs up and queuing limited transactions during nightly or
weekly scheduled outage, no longer applies with modern 24 hour SLAs. Think CICS TS/CICSplex, DFSMStvs and others, DB2 data sharing, MQ shared queues,
IMS HALDB/IMSplex, z/TPF, Sysplex, etc., etc.)  Here's some technical
information:

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247268.html
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp4337.html

And then there are Japanese ATMs, but that's a digression for another time.




Timothy,

Thanks for the last entry. In the late 80's (early 90's?) we picked up a Tandem at the insistence of management. It was put in the data center and *NEVER* powered up it sat there like all good boat anchors. I never heard who was responsible for the coming of the the machine. It must have been high up though or I would have heard. At the time were were CICS and had IDMS. A few years go by and CICS and DB2 are there and are still there. Why they needed it was anybodies guess. But I guess they had to spend money to show the brokerage houses we were on the spot. We had pretty good uptime, if there was an "outage" it was a TP issue. I think (I could be wrong) they only outage we had was an MVS crash and that was for 30 minutes. This was over 10 years, I worked it out and it was in the 99.99999 range but I guess that wasn't good enough. There might have been IDMS problems that I never heard of so the numbers may have been different from the above. The IDMS DBA's were quite secretive,

Ed

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to