> -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Howard Brazee > Skickat: den 14 november 2007 18:35 > Till: [email protected] > Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING... > > On 14 Nov 2007 08:42:26 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Berg) > wrote: > > >> Old programs don't use new COPY statements unless they are > modified to > >> do so. > >> > >> But future programs will. > >> > > > >Old programs that are recompiled get the "new" copys/versions. > >And fails in compilation if they contains the ":tag:" format > >(if they - as I mentioned - are not using REPLACING). > >And that is not acceptable. > > That's not my definition of a new copy member. That's my definition > of a modified copy member. > > When I write new copy members, I design them with REPLACING in mind.
Well, yes, "modified" is the correct term. My bad. Since the start of this thread I have shortened the wording (in reality there is both new and modified COPYs due to our use of "stacked" COPY statements). Thomas _____________________________________________________________ Thomas Berg Specialist IT Utveckling Swedbank AB (Publ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
