Thomas,
Not that I like it but here's what works for me:
COPY DASACOMM
REPLACING DASACOMM-CBV1-ADDR BY ALOG-DASACOMM-CBV1-ADDR
DASACOMM-ACTION-CODE BY ALOG-DASACOMM-ACTION-CODE
DASACOMM-RETURN-CODE BY ALOG-DASACOMM-RETURN-CODE.
HTH,
-Victor-
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:37:44 +0100, Thomas Berg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We (the project) can't force other parts of the organization
>(that is not part of the project) to do work that for which
>they have no budget. (That is: change, compile, *test* and
>update the production.)
>And if a programmer is called in in the middle of the night
>to fix a production problem and is seriously delayed by the
>compilation error we will be hanged by the CIO or CEO.
>(Again, the availability of the production applications goes
>before *anything*.)
>
>The problem we tried to solve was that we have to either
>make the "new" copys conforming to our current standard
>that is needed for (among other things) to work with
>Datamanager *OR* make them compatible with the old programs.
>
>(We had a preprocessor - MetaCOBOL - earlier that have a
>COPY REPLACING functionality that would have solved our
>problem.)
>
>My initial point when I started this thread was that if
>You make an effort to create a functionality, why doing
>it badly ?
>
>Thomas
>_____________________________________________________________
>Thomas Berg Specialist IT Utveckling Swedbank AB (Publ)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
