our zfs filesystems are sms managed, and our cloning procedure had to change
very little when switching to zFS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucymarie Ruth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 6:48 PM
Subject: ZFS: good, bad, or ugly?
Why shouldn't we convert?
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
SMS-managed, non-esoterically cataloged filesystems. Not good for those
folks who like to clone their filesystems just like any other datasets
when building their system residence volumes.
"Email Firewall" made the following annotations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Warning:
All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail
system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the
recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended
only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have
received this message in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
==============================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
