In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/07/2007
at 02:32 PM, Phil Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Back then, though, IBM perceived the lack of a stack as a marketing
>_adantage_. The competition (Burroughs, CDC, ICL) was all stack-based.
No. Not even Burroughs was all stack based and CDC wasn't at all. To say
nothing of the remaining dwarves.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
