> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Roger Bowler
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:35:38 -0000, Phil Payne wrote:
> >IBM has already formally stated its position.
>
> Except that they haven't. [ snip ]
>
> What I *can* tell you is that none of the functionality in
> Hercules was put there as a result of any external tool. The
> key point here is that I *know* how Hercules was developed,
> whereas you are only guessing.
>
> Your suggestion that UMX and PSI copied their technology from
> Hercules also seems highly unlikely. Sounds to me more like
> somebody else's sour grapes.
> If you think your assertion has any validity, why don't you
> make your accusations directly to UMX and PSI.
Better: File an amicus curiae brief with the court on IBM's behalf.
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
