In a message dated 12/6/2007 1:23:55 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I'am aware of one: Wide open code could mean more holes/errors disclosed. It also could mean more errors FIXED. Not to mention more suggestions to enhance it. What's better ? >> Back when the OCO battle was really hot it was reported at SHARE that one of the biggest pushers for OCO were some of the Change teams that had seen the increase in user code and mods grow more than linearly. I know one of the hardest bugs I ever shot was a JES3 hickey that was clobbering itself only to find out we were running a 'Common' VM mod that trampled a little on some of the DIAG code. **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
