On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:29:46 -0800, George Fogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --snip-- I also don't want vendor >products and in-house EMCS code setting this bit to bypass security checking. >I don't have a problem with its intended purpose as Scott Fagen indicated. >George Fogg --snip--
In retrospect, it was probably a _bad_ idea to make such a function available on the external. At the time (ca 1988/9), I was still pretty wet behind the ears and was just doing what the team leader asked. In retrospect, the _right_ answer probably should have been a non-externalized service/entry into command processing that the sysplex code just dropped the command into, rather than setting a wacky bit on in the parameter list and re-issuing SVC34. Probably looks weird in system trace, too. Scott Fagen Enterprise Systems Management ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
