Just to clarify: if GRS is part of a basic sysplex, it uses the same PATHIN/PATHOUT CTCs that XCF uses. SCTC or FCTC is required.
Is there still a reason for JES2 BSC NJE?
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthew Stitt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
G.COM> To
Sent by: IBM [email protected]
Mainframe cc
Discussion List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU> Re: FICON vs ESCON CTC's
12/19/2007 02:59
PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
Discussion List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
On the plus side, the unit address limitation with ESCON is greatly
increased.
On the negative side, you cannot have a BCTC device, which is required for
GRS and JES2 BSC NJE connections.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:19:36 -0600, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:17:20 -0500, Mark Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>Is there any advantage in migrating CTC's from ESCON to FICON?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
