In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/31/2007
at 12:38 AM, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Shmuel:
>> Its been a LONG time... But IIRC the 360/30 POPS
There was no 360/30 POPS.
>>had at least some of them
That would be Functional Specifications, FETOM and the like, not POPS.
>>The book actually had instruction timing specifics for each
>>instruction.
If you look at the Functional Specifications for several models, you will
see that the formulae get progressively more complicated for the faster
and newer models. I believe that that's the reason IBM stopped publishing
them. The timings, of course, have nothing to do with the question of
documenting DIAG, which AFAIK has never been in Functional Specifications
but only in the FE manuals.
PS: Please don't quote (">") your original text.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
