On 4 Jan 2008 10:28:37 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>I'd be overjoyed if IBM would admit to the possibility of a parm string 
>up to 32,767 bytes, and design parm-driven software with that in mind. 
>And allow JCL to accept a parm of that length. Changes to code would be 
>minimal, since it already uses a halfword length. Changes to JCL 
>processing might be rather major, so I don't expect this to be done 
>overnight, as long as it's kep in mind.

Why should this be a problem in JCL processing?   Do you expect there
will be jobs that depend upon the current limitations?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to