----------------<snip>-----------------
No, only the one that is coded. If you have PARM=" " coded, it works as always. If you
code NEWPARM="" they Getmain an area for something larger like 256 bytes and everything
else works the same. That way you could have a controlled implementation without mucking up what's
there. Once the support for newparm is in the system, you can add it where needed.
Then we need to change our compilers to handle both parms.
------------------------<unsnip>--------------------
Maybe. Or perhaps require that all options be specified on PROCESS
statements. Other considerations might intrude on this, though.
Maybe a front-end process or that creates a long PARM string from
control statements?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
