On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:07:45 -0500, Thompson, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >VSM CHECKREGIONLOSS in DIAGxx. ><SNIP> > >Thanx, I think this may be what we need to do. > >And like I originally said, this is a 90% IBM Vanilla shop. We have NO >exits that are involved in this area. We know that RACROUTE create and >destroy are done in pairs (and IBM concurs, we do them in pairs). But, >the ACEEs are NOT going away in a timely fashion along with some other >C/Bs which we have no control over. > >And should the job be cancelled in the same INIT about 3 times, we have >seen where there is LESS than .5M of available PVT. The rest of the >below the line storage is all consumed in LSQA subpools!! > These aren't CA-Endevor jobs by any chance, are they? Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
