On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:00:52 -0500, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>You can be certain that POST will always support the CS quick-post protocol
>and the LOCAL LOCK.

I've never understood why, after all these years, IBM hasn't put the
quick-post code right into the POST macro. Of course there are special cases
(XM post, most obviously), but the macro normally knows if it's a simple POST.

Is there any case where it is desirable to issue the SVC (or otherwise call
POST)? Is it to cover the case where the task being POSTed has a higher
dispatching priority, and should therefore run first, before the POSTing
task runs again? Surely this is a long obsolete application design, after
thirty years of multiprocessor machines being in common use.

Tony H.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to