HI John,

>2) What happens, God forbid, should Shai get killed in an car accident?
>Who will support this? Will the source be available?

If a lot of people will use my product I am sure that they will pray for me,
if all the religious will pray (I hope also Muslim..), I am secure (RACF
security).

>4) What about if Microsoft comes out with Windows Server 2010 and the PC
>software fails for some reason. I.e. it is no longer compatible for some
>reason. Again, wait until Shai, or whomever, gets the new Windows
>software and "ports" his code to run on it. In the mean time, no
>upgrading that PC server.

My software in PC will run in any PC now and 1000 hundred from now.

Thanks,
 Shai




I am not going to do the DB2 queries from PC.


On 1/28/08, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some other thoughts on this.
>
> The plus is obviously that this will allow a PC application to access
> mainframe DB2 data without any mainframe involvement. That means no
> mainframe CPU cycles for these report or even "data transfer". That
> means no license costs (other than what Shai imposes). That sounds nice.
>
> The problems (no offense) are:
>
> 1) Shai may (or may not) decide that this function could be a "cash cow"
> and decides to up the price to be "on par" with other mainframe
> software. I'm not saying that he will. I'm saying that he could. And
> that is a consideration, like with any other software that is "single
> sourced". I know that I've gotten bitten by certain other vendors in
> this manner. It's too costly to convert and too costly to maintain.
>
> 2) What happens, God forbid, should Shai get killed in an car accident?
> Who will support this? Will the source be available?
>
> 3) Assume this API is the cat's pajamas and a lot of reports are written
> on the PC side of the world. And these reports are now mission critical.
> IBM now puts out a new release of DB2. The mainframe applications are
> shielded from any internal changes in the DASD resident data structures,
> of course. But the PC applications are dead in the water until Shai (or
> whomever) has a chance to figure out how to access the new structure.
> So, the mainframe is now held hostage to this PC API. Shai: Are you like
> CA and other OEMs who get pre-release versions of IBM's DB2 in order to
> make changes to your software to support it? (I don't know, I'm asking).
> If not, then I would be very concerned. As "suppose", lets assume the
> worse. IBM releases a new DB2. One feature is encrypted tables.
> Management, or the legal department, decides that encrypted tables will
> be mandatory in order to avoid possible lawsuits. OOPS, how long before
> these tables can be read by this API reliably? What if IBM somehow gets
> a patent on the actual data structure on DASD?
>
> 4) What about if Microsoft comes out with Windows Server 2010 and the PC
> software fails for some reason. I.e. it is no longer compatable for some
> reason. Again, wait until Shai, or whomever, gets the new Windows
> software and "ports" his code to run on it. In the mean time, no
> upgrading that PC server.
>
> I don't mean to be a nay sayer. But I am a professional pessimist. I try
> to figure out possible problems and how to avoid them. The above are
> just some of the pros vs. cons to be considered by anybody who might
> want this functionality.
>
> --
> John McKown
> Senior Systems Programmer
> HealthMarkets
> Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
> Administrative Services Group
> Information Technology
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
> and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
> strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
> offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
> it.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to