On Feb 16, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 16:09 -0600 on 02/15/2008, Mark Zelden wrote about DFSMS APAR
OA22738 - IGD17295I:
Interesting. I had an extended off-list thread with someone about
this problem
last May after this subject came up. There was really nothing
that could be
done because they used the LIKE parameter.
It seems that IBM is attacking the symptom not the problem. Since
PDSEs are only allowed to be single version, why not just FORCE the
vol-count to be 1 and issue a message STATING this was done if the
dynamic allocation requests/allows allocation of more than one volume?
Could it be that in the future (????) they will be allowed to be
multi volume? I was looking over some notes from a IBM announcement
and either I wrote it down wrong (possible) that IBM opened with some
sort of statement that they were looking at making them multi volume.
Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
