On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:11:53 -0600, Ed Gould 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Its been IBM's mode of writing OS code since OS/360 and if I am not
>to far off some version of PLS has been responsible for every release
>of OS/360 all the way up to Z/os . of course if ita not done in PLx
>it was written in assembler its almost always been one or the other.
>
>If LINUX is written in C then whose version of C is it? DIGNUS/SAS
>(?)/ or ? it certainly can't be IBM's (at least the one they released
>to to the general public).

Ed, you're either not listening, have just crawled out from under a rock, or 
are 
being obstinate.  Didn't you hear?  Linux is an Open Source operating 
system!  Please stop trying to paint it with 50 years of IBM mainframe 
operating system history.  As an open source effort, it is developed with open 
source tools.  To wit, the GNU C/C++ compiler (gcc).  Yes, you can write an 
operating system, including device drivers, in C.  If MVS were being written 
anew today, much of it would be in C.

To the extent that machine-level instructions are present in open code (similar 
to PL/X GENERATE), they are there because they are doing things that the 
compiler cannot do.  This is true on ANY operating system written in ANY 
language; there are times when only machine language (platform assembler) 
will do.  And before you ask, the assembler in Linux is open source, too.. 
What is it?  You may have guessed: the GNU Assembler (gas).

>Its typical of people like you to end the discussion with an ignore.
>I tend to read everybody's opinion then form a judgement but with the
>new generation if you don't want to hear you just turn them off.
>Thats up to you but you are destined to not understand someone else's
>opinion by doing so. You will also follow people unquestioningly
>usually that shows where you fall.

LOL, Ed.  Phil is not of the New Generation and is actually a careful listener, 
willing to learn new things.  You have made yet another uninformed 
judgement.  :-(

I get the impression that you have an internal picture of the universe that is 
colored just so, oriented just so, shaded just so, and are not of a mind to 
perceive the universe anew when presented with new information, or to 
accept that there are other pictures that are just as valid as your own.

Alan Altmark
speaking for himself

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to