> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Klein
> 
> John,
>   I can't find anything at that page that restricts the use 
> of DLL's with the integrated translator.  
> 
> FYI,
>   *both* the COBOL "CICS" and "DLL" compiler options require 
> the NODYNAM compiler option, so that can't be it.
> 
> Can you point me to the text on that page (or anywhere) that 
> restricts the use of DLL's with the integrated translator 
> (for cases where it is valid if you pre-translate the code)?
> 
> Sorry to be "obtuse" - but I just don't see this restriction 
> in either the CICS or COBOL documentation.

I don't find any explicit declaration that using the Integrated
Translator is "incompatible" with "DLL mode compiles", either.  I've not
tried any "DLL mode compiles", with or without EXEC CICS commands in the
source, so I can't offer any empirical evidence one way or the other.
The CICS doc doesn't mention anything about the Integrated Translator
itself "forcing" any COBOL compile-time options; only that certain
options "must be in effect" to use it.

Perhaps the OP would provide an example?

    -jc-

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to