[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shane) writes: > I guess RFC2549 would be no good either then ... ???
one of the april 1st RFCs from my rfc index http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm click on "Term (term->RFC#)" in "RFCs listed by" section and scroll down to "April1" April1 5242 5241 4824 4042 4041 3751 3514 3252 3251 3093 3092 3091 2795 2551 2550 2549 2325 2324 2323 2322 2321 2100 1927 1926 1925 1924 1776 1607 1606 1605 1437 1313 1217 1149 1097 852 748 clicking on the RFC # (in the index) brings up the RFC summary in the lower frame. 2549 IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service, Waitzman D., 1999/04/01 (6pp) (.txt=9519) (Updates 1149) (Refs 1149) (Ref'ed By 3117) as always ... clicking on the ".txt=nnn" field (in the summary), fetches the actual RFC. as noted, 2549 references 1149: 1149 E A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers, Waitzman D., 1990/04/01 (2pp) (.txt=3215) (Updated by 2549) (Ref'ed By 1543, 1818, 2321, 2549) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
