On Fri, 2 May 2008 19:26:34 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>>
>In your circumstance, I'd be inclined to use MSG(WTP) rather than MSG(2).
>But I've already been wrong once today.  YMMV.
>

Yes, that would be a better option also.  Thanks.  No excuse except that
I copied the code from somewhere else without thinking about it.  Although
if the ALLOCATE above worked I would never expect the CONCAT to fail 
and if the ALLOCATE failed I would see that.  

Mark   
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to