On Fri, 02 May 2008 22:01:10 +0200, Thomas Zierer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>JZOS has become part of Unix System Services in z/OS. Handling is very >easy, especially if combined with other Java tools like ANT. There is an >interesting sample shiped with JZOS: Installing an running a Apache >Tomcat server as a batch job or started task. It really takes only a few >minutes to get the server up and running. > >I havn't made any research on performance, but the last I've heard is >that Java is about 30% slower as COBOL, which is reduced, if your S/390 >uses special chips. Also IMS uses now special regions, JMPP and JBMP for >Java apps but I'be have no experience with this. This gets complicated and speaks as much to IBM marketing as anything else. Java batch may well take 30 to 50 percent more CPU yet cost less because the Java is run on a zAAP which doesn't count toward capacity when calculating software pricing. If someone got bright on some of the Java functions, this may be even less. IBM pricing can be a driving factor to moving to another language. What the marketing droids fail to realize is that once all of an installations work load is moved to C/C++, Java and the web, it becomes easy to move to another platform. Of course it is harder to move to another language than the enthusiasts of X claim. This is especially true if people don't really know how the current system operates, down to the various subtleties. I wonder if any organization knows even a good percentage of their components and the implications of interaction. The number of fixes needed for any of the operating systems of affliction or choice from the various vendors leaves me skeptical. > >Regards > >Thomas > > >Pakku schrieb: >> I've spent much of this morning looking for some comparison between >> the performance of Java and COBOL for batch programming on z/OS. I >> haven't found any useful information and am hoping I might find some >> here. >> >> I know that IBM bought the JZOS product a couple years back with the >> intent of enabling Java in the batch world. >> Has this taken off? >> >> Also read somewhere that given that Java has to be reinterpreted (from >> the bytecode produced by compilation) by the JVM at runtime, there is >> no way it could outperform COBOL in classical batch processes like >> payroll or month-end credit card statement processing. >> >> Is this so? >> >> Would really appreciate hearing from anyone who has experience with >> JZOS or other forms of running batch Java on MVS. >> >> Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
