> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
> 
> Well, if ya'll remember, we've had a spate of COBOL File 
> Status codes of
> 
> 97 since we split our z/OS image in two. This occurs when the 
> file is open for OUTPUT on one image and a COBOL program 
> opens the same file for INPUT on the other image.
> 
> Well, we have another File Status. This time with a code of 
> 90. The diagnostics for that are not as obvious, but the 
> question is the same.
> Is
> this do to the LPAR split? If so, how do we "fix" it. I don't 
> know off hand. None, or maybe only few, of our COBOL program 
> use the extended FILE STATUS phrase to get VSAM codes. This 
> particular program does not. The only IEC161I messages that I 
> see in the job are the ones which normally have a file status 
> of 97, not 90.
> 
> Any preliminary help before I tell the programmer to change 
> the program so that it displays the VSAM file status codes as 
> well? Everybody knows what the response to that will be: "We 
> never had to do that in the past!!!" 
> <sigh>. I hate this splitting of the image in twain. It is 
> rooting out all sorts of "bugs".

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IGY3LR31/6.1.
8.9.1

And

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IGY3PG32/1.13
.4.5

(In that order.)

    -jc-

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to