> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 11:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: VSAM / COBOL question - redux (fwd) > > >They're gonna scream: "I didn't need to do that in the > PAST!!! <sob><whine><moan>" > > That is their problem! > Progress requires change. > If your management mandated Parallel SYSPLEX (which I believe > is progress), then people have to change! > There is no point in moaning about the past; face the future, > together. > > - > Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Not parallel sysplex, it costs too much (ICF engine). We are a basic sysplex. And not for any good reason, IMO. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
