If, as the article states, they were using ISPF as a batch monitoring
and management tool, I wonder how many other "wrong" tools they were
using.  I'm not surprised they believe they are saving money.  It may
even be true if they started using appropriate tools.

They also had an interesting proof of concept technique.  Send some code
to the contractor and then visit 24 hours later.  I wonder what the
success criteria were.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Green [mailto:snip] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 8:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Another one bites the dust.

As the subject says...

http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci13
12380,00.html?track=NL-576&ad=638786&asrc=EM_NLN_3601410&uid=1900046

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to