On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:24:39 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/19/2008 > at 12:08 PM, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >>Basic vs. Parallel sysplex isn't the issue. > >It's part of the issue. > No, it isn't. >> It's whether you are using a shared (sysplex) file system >> configuration. > >And the question is whether that is supported with basic sysplex. > It is supported with basic sysplex. Doesn't my statement - "Basic vs. Parallel sysplex isn't the issue" already imply that clearly enough? So the determining factor is what I already said - a shared file system, not the sysplex type. Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
