IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on 05/30/2008 02:12:16 PM:
> CA mentions APAR OA24573, which corrects a problem in setting AMODE > on return from SMFEWTM processing. This is speculation, but I think that > CAS9 may establish an intercept in SMF processing, so their code might be > sensitive to changes in the AMODE established by IBM's code, > > Bill > > On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:54:33 EDT, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >In a message dated 5/30/2008 6:54:45 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >Mmmm - how long have CA had to re-write (or better yet, inter) CAS9 ???. > >Should have been disposed of years ago. > > > > > >>> > >Out of curiosity's sake what changed in z/OS 1.9 that made it quit working? The PTFs for OA24573 have been marked PE, and APAR OA25292 has been opened. IEEMB838 was moved above 16MB in PLPA in z/OS 1.9, and a glue routine was created. Problems created by that change (for example, SMFEWTM issued in 24-bit addressing mode returns in 31-bit addressing mode) caused the creation of OA24573. Unfortunately, I neglected to consider the effect of ISV intercepts while fixing OA24573, despite having seen that the interface was intercepted in the customer's dump. A senior moment, I suppose (not sure how many of those I am allowed before my coding license gets revoked). Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
