On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:49:39 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>...it is insensitive/insensitivity not nonsensitive/nonsensitivity or >>nonsensible/nonsensibility. > >What are you talking about? >What current thread? >You didn't include even a piece of another post! >... He was refering to the thread "ISPF CLIST case nonsensibility". He either missed what I assume was a play on words (and should be given a resounding "Nonesense!" in reply), or he was continuing the play in a manner too subtle for me to follow. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
