On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 14:06:50 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden >> >> [ snip ] >> >> Are SYS1.SCUNIMG and SYS1.SCUNTBL cataloged? Is SYS1.SCUNIMG >> in the LNKLST? > >We don't have any SYS1.SCUNxxx datasets linklisted, and dynamic Unicode >services works fine. Because you have a CUNUNIxx member with an entry still (you say this below). This has been discussed by Brian several times and is in one of the SHARE bit buckets. If you include SCUNIMG in the LNKLST, you don't need any CUNUNIxx members at all, which is my preference. The small (FSVO small) amount of storage wasted is no concern at this shop (and probably 95%+ these days). Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html > >> Were the migration actions performed to >> remove CUNUNIxx parmlib members as documented in the z/OS 1.7 >> migration guide? > >We had to ensure that CUNUNIxx had at least one entry on 1.7. We added >the entries for CP1252 because DB2 v8 "complained" about that specific >codepage being "missing" or "not found". We left them in for 1.9 >because "it still works". > > -jc- > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
