On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:03:20 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: > >While I applaud IBM for finally making this change and all the >vendors who are modifying their code for this (and Sam K. and others >for pushing the vendors), I really don't have a problem running with >ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(YES) on my systems at this point. The exposure >has been there forever and making it go away overnight (in relative >terms of time) just isn't a big concern for me. > What other schedule would you propose as more comfortable?
How long has user key CSA been recognized as undesirable? I suspect that some programmers won't mend their ways until the situation becomes critical; extending the schedule delays the impact, but does not render it less abrupt. >at this point. Talk to me again in a couple of years... > Of course, if you plan to retire within that couple of years, you have a private motive for the delay. -- gil If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well It were done quickly... -- Macbeth ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
