----- Original Message -----
From: "Jousma, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: Moving 3390-3 to 3390-9
Tom,
I think we are arguing semantics here. The dataset is moved once LDMF
completes, and new allocations of the moved datasets go to the new
volume, and those tasks that had it allocated still get it at the old
location until they are recycle, and LDMF takes care of keeping them in
sync.
What you said was: " They're only transparent if the datasets are not
ENQ'd. Any applications holding datasets will still have to be recycled
so the dataset can move."
When I read what you originally wrote, you seemed to imply that nothing
could be done while the dataset was enqueued. Almost any dataset move is
transparent if it is not allocated. :-)
You say tomayto, I say tomahto... I was actually comparing the transparency
of zDMF and FDRMOVE to FDRPAS and TDMF, which is completely transparent,
even for ENQ'd datasets. Neither FDRMOVE nor zDMF provide the transparency
of FDRPAS and TDMF, since you have to take an application outage to complete
the move. Fair enough?
Regards,
Tom Conley
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
