And no mention of ROI - Return On Investment. How would you even track when the $28 Million paid for itself? As for efficient, don't most systems add bloat and complexity instead of simplifying them?
Have you ever seen a really get-off-the-mainframe project that saved money? Not when they add all te expenses in rather than just the ones they want to incude. But maybe they do enter an application and reach a go/nogo decision quicker. That is good for the few deserving recipients, for $28 million. Notice the 'plan' only needed $5 million. On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:01:21 -0400, Doug Fuerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I think every buzz word on that new fangled project management stuff is >in there. This is such bull.Can't they just say we made the process more >efficient, and eliminated waste? No, too simple... And probably not the >case..... Inertia is pretty strong.... > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
