Will, I think I get it now, I finally looked up the message IEF188I and this supports all the posts I received. Please forgive and me and do not confuse my ignorance with stupidity :-).
Ted, this horse finally took a drink and it did quench my thirst. Sorry to take so long I was delirious with dehydration <G>. Thanks, Fletch <snip> On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:05:29 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I mean no dis-respect, but we've told the OP: >...snipped... >2. All libraries in a concatenation for STEP/JOB LIB must be >authorised, or the whole list is not. > In fairness, though, if this were about losing APF-authorization his unauthorized JOBLIB would not matter (as the module is not in it). However, it's not about APF-authorization, but assignment of PPT attributes, and for that case the JOBLIB does matter. The answer is the same, of course. He can not have that JOBLIB in effect for the DSNUTILB step. He could: (a) remove the JOBLIB, possibly replacing it for other steps in the job with STEPLIB DD statements. Or (b) override the JOBLIB for the DSNUTILB step by providing that step with an APF-authorized STEPLIB. -- Walt Farrell, CISSP IBM STSM, z/OS Security Design <snip> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
