Ted, So if you were consolidating 2300 x 3390-3 onto 128 x 3390-54 you advocate doing zero analysis, setting up alias based on a rule of thumb, and only do something if or when the application misses a service level. . I'm glad it's your dog.
I had the impression this kind of capacity planning is the kind of the practice that separates MF from 'NIX and Windoze I never interpreted your tag line like that, though it makes sense. I took it as a reference to ignoring all warnings - like your petrol gauge. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Here we go again (was z/OS Hot Topics 19) > > >Ted, > > >I totally disagree. Configuring Q-Depth correctly from the get-go is > just as important as configuring PAV and HYPERPAV correctly. I call it > preventative > maintenance. > > Well, we'll all disagree then. > If response (application) is acceptable, why waste your time? > > >I guess the approach you prescribe goes with your tag line :-) > > No, it comes from too many tasks; too little time. > > - > Too busy driving to stop for gas! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
